style(lint): add T20 noqa directives for existing violations#1064
Draft
Aaron ("AJ") Steers (aaronsteers) wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Add noqa: T201/T203 to 78 existing print() calls across 33 files. Each instance needs review to determine if it should be replaced with proper logging or kept with the noqa directive. Co-Authored-By: AJ Steers <aj@airbyte.io>
Contributor
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
👋 Greetings, Airbyte Team Member!Here are some helpful tips and reminders for your convenience. 💡 Show Tips and TricksTesting This PyAirbyte VersionYou can test this version of PyAirbyte using the following: # Run PyAirbyte CLI from this branch:
uvx --from 'git+https://github.com/airbytehq/PyAirbyte.git@devin/1783312011-ruff-t20-comply' pyairbyte --help
# Install PyAirbyte from this branch for development:
pip install 'git+https://github.com/airbytehq/PyAirbyte.git@devin/1783312011-ruff-t20-comply'PR Slash CommandsAirbyte Maintainers can execute the following slash commands on your PR:
📚 Show Repo GuidanceHelpful ResourcesCommunity SupportQuestions? Join the #pyairbyte channel in our Slack workspace. |
Contributor
Code Coverage OverviewLanguages: Python Python / code-coverage/pytest-fastThe overall coverage in the branch is 67%. The coverage in the branch is 65%. Show a code coverage summary of the most impacted files.
Python / code-coverage/pytest-no-credsThe overall coverage in the branch is 67%. The coverage in the branch is 65%. Show a code coverage summary of the most impacted files.
Python / code-coverage/pytestThe overall coverage in the branch is 72%. The coverage in the branch is 71%. Show a code coverage summary of the most impacted files.
Updated |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR targets PR #1063.
Adds
# noqa: T201/# noqa: T203to 78 existingprint()/pprint()calls across 33 files. Each instance needs review to determine if it should be replaced with proper logging or kept with the noqa directive.Most violations are in CLI tools, examples, and test files where print is expected. Library code violations should be migrated to
loggingover time.Link to Devin session: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/6ae2048fc77a4f278aee3dd022384f4a
Requested by: Aaron ("AJ") Steers (@aaronsteers)